HONG KONG, 13 June 2023. CSPI Ratings has upgraded Mudanjiang City Investment Group Company Limited’s (MDJCIG) global scale long-term issuer credit rating (LTICR) to ‘BB+’ from ‘BB’. The outlook is stable.
MDJCIG’s issuer credit rating is based on a standalone credit profile of ‘b-’ and our assessment that its parent, Mudanjiang State-owned Assets Investment Holdings Company Limited (MDJSAI), has an almost certain willingness to provide extraordinary support in the event of financial distress. MDJSAI is wholly-owned by the Mudanjiang State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Office (MDJSASAO), making it a government-related entity (GRE) and its credit profile is linked to that of the Mudanjiang city government. MDJCIG’s rating is based on the perspective of parent support, and is underpinned by its parent MDJSAI’s almost certain willingness to support it and its leading position in Mudanjiang’s urban construction.
With its predecessor established in 2000, MDJCIG is an important investment and financing entity and a large state-owned operation platform in the Mudanjiang city of Heilongjiang province. The Company is the main entity authorised by the Mudanjiang government and is primarily responsible for the construction and development of the majority of urban construction projects in the city. MDJCIG has over 80% market share of Mudanjiang’s affordable housing development projects, covering all projects except for Jiangnan New Town. The Company primarily operates in three business segments, namely urban construction, other construction and other businesses.
KEY RATING RATIONALES
Credit Strengths
Executor of Mudanjiang’s blueprint for municipal construction and development. MDJCIG engages in Mudanjiang’s economic development by being the city’s most important platform for urban construction, including affordable housing and infrastructure, land development and municipal asset operations. The Company has over 80% market share in Mudanjiang’s affordable housing development projects. As such, a failure in MDJCIG’s operation will have a significant impact on the city’s urban development progress and hurt its economic growth. We assess that in the event of financial distress, the Mudanjiang government, through MDJSAI, is willing to take the necessary measures to support MDJCIG and ensure that the economic development of the city is not affected.
Long-standing track record of government support. MDJCIG received government subsidies of various types, amounted to RMB538 million, RMB964 million and RMB0.17 million, respectively, in 2020, 2021 and 2022, and accounted for up to 93% of the Company’s net profit. In addition, MDJCIG also received capital injections, land and asset allocations, and other non-operational revenue from the Mudanjiang government to support the Company’s operation and development. We believe that the Mudanjiang government will continue to support MDJCIG, through MDJSAI, to facilitate the city’s land development.
Strong ties with the government via the parent. MDJCIG is Mudanjiang’s second largest local government financing vehicle (LGFV) in terms of revenue and total assets. It is 83.6% owned by its parent MDJSAI, which is wholly-owned by MDJSASAO. Both MDJSAI and MDJCIG’s boards of directors and senior management team are appointed by the Mudanjiang Party Committee and their scope of business is approved by MDJSASAO. All of these strengthen the supervision and collaboration among the Mudanjiang city government, MDJSAI and MDJCIG.
Modest Mudanjiang’s creditworthiness with higher-level government support. As a prefecture-level city located in the southeast part of Heilongjiang province, Mudanjiang is within the ‘golden triangle’ of the Chinese, Russian and Korean peninsula and an important city in northeastern China. While the city’s self-sufficiency in its budgetary revenue has been relatively low, higher-level governments have been giving consistent and strong fiscal support to Mudanjiang and this significantly augments the city’s revenue scope. To elaborate, support from higher-level governments has accounted for over 70% in Mudanjiang’s budgetary revenue for the past few years. As a consequence, the city had a resilient 14.6% revenue growth in 2022 despite contracted land sales, while its fiscal deficit remained modest at 10.9%.
Credit Weaknesses
High leverage, low profitability and weak cash flow. We estimate that MDJCIG’s net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio will stay above 25x in the next few years. The Company’s gross profit margin is thin as most of its projects are awarded by the Mudanjiang government on a not-for-profit basis. On completion of project construction, the city government will buy back the assets for a price that generally includes a 15% mark-up over the total development cost. Besides, the long period of receivables collection also leads to weak cash flows from operations.
Tight liquidity. We expect MDJCIG’s liquidity to be tight with its 12-month forward cash flow liquidity ratio of 0.9x. We believe the Company’s liquid assets on hand and expected funds from operations are insufficient to fulfil all cash outflow requirements if all short-term debt payments have to be repaid without renewal. MDJCIG’s current assets are mostly land that is classified as inventories, and receivables to government-related entities, both of which are not very liquid. The Company will require significant financing to cover its debt payments and maintain its business operations. However, we expect financial pressure on its interest payments to be low when the government and parent support is sufficient.
RATING OUTLOOK
The stable outlook for MDJCIG reflects our expectation that the credit profile of the Mudanjiang city government and MDJSAI will remain stable, and that MDJCIG is able to maintain its strategic role in the development of Mudanjiang going forward.
We would consider a rating downgrade if 1) MDJCIG’s ties with its parent MDJSAI loosen from the current level; 2) the fiscal strengths of the Mudanjiang city government weaken substantially or its debt burden exacerbates tremendously; and/or 3) MDJCIG’s business scopes develop into more commercial and market-driven sectors, such as commercial property development, as opposed to social welfare-oriented businesses.
We would consider a rating upgrade if 1) the Mudanjiang city government’s economic and fiscal revenue scale improves on a sustained basis; 2) MDJSAI’s importance to the Mudanjiang city government increases significantly; and/or 3) there is a substantial improvement in MDJCIG’s leverage and financial profile.
ANALYSTS CONTACT | MEDIA CONTACT | OTHER ENQUIRIES |
Primary Analyst Vincent Ha, CFA +852 3615 8307 Secondary Analyst Brian Lam +852 3615 8339 Committee Chair Ke Chen, PhD +852 3615 8316 |
Date of Relevant Rating Committee: 31 May 2023
Additional information is available on www.cspi-ratings.com
Related Criteria
General Corporate Rating Criteria (15 March 2018)
Government-Related Entities Rating Criteria (31August 2018)
Corporate Financial Adjustments and Ratio Definitions (7 May 2018)
DISCLAIMER
Solicited ratings – disclosed and results not affected
CSPI Credit Ratings Company Limited (“CSPI Ratings”, “Pengyuan”, “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) publishes credit ratings and reports based on the established methodologies and in compliance with the rating process. For more information on policies, procedures, and methodologies, please refer to the Company’s website www.cspi-ratings.com. The Company reserves the right to amend, change, remove, publish any information on its website without prior notice and at its sole discretion.
All credit ratings and reports are subject to disclaimers and limitations. CREDIT RATINGS ARE NOT FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE AND MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY, SELL OR HOLD ANY SECURITIES AND DO NOT ADDRESS/REFLECT MARKET VALUE OF ANY SECURITIES. USERS OF CREDIT RATINGS ARE EXPECTED TO BE TRAINED FOR INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS DECISIONS.
CREDIT RATINGS ADDRESS ONLY CREDIT RISK. THE COMPANY DEFINES THE CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT THE RATED ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL AND/OR FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY BECOME DUE. CREDIT RATINGS MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED AS FACTS OF A SPECIFIC DEFAULT PROBABILITY OR AS A PREDICTIVE MEASURE OF A DEFAULT PROBABILITY. Credit ratings constitute the Company’s forward-looking opinion of the credit rating committee and include predictions about future events which by definition cannot be validated as facts.
For the purpose of the rating process, the Company obtains sufficient quality factual information from sources which are believed by the Company to be reliable and accurate. The Company does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or third-party verification of any information it uses during the rating process. The issuer and its advisors are ultimately responsible for the accuracy of the information provided for the rating process. The Company had access to the accounts and other relevant internal documents of the rated entity or its related party. The Company has examined the quality of information used in the rating process in accordance with established process and it is satisfied with the quality of information used.
Users of the Company’s credit ratings shall refer to the rating symbols and definitions published on the Company’s website. Credit ratings with the same rating symbol may not fully reflect all small differences in the degrees of risk, because credit ratings are relative measures of the credit risk.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION GIVEN OR MADE BY THE COMPANY IN ANY FORM OR MANNER. In no event shall the Company, its directors, shareholders, employees, representatives be liable to any party for any damages, expenses, fees, or losses in connection with any use of the information published by the Company.
The Company reserves the right to take any rating action for any reasons the Company deems sufficient at any time and in its sole discretion. The publication and maintenance of credit ratings are subject to availability of sufficient information.
The Company may receive compensation for its credit ratings, normally from issuers, underwriters or obligors. The information about the Company’s fee schedule can be provided upon the request.
The rated entity participated in the rating process. The credit rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or to its related party and, following such disclosure, the credit rating result has not been amended before being issued.
The Company reserves the right to disseminate its credit ratings and reports through its website, the Company’s social media pages and authorised third parties. No content published by the Company may be modified, reproduced, transferred, distributed or reverse engineered in any form by any means without the prior written consent of the Company.
The Company’s credit ratings and reports are not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in a jurisdiction where such usage would infringe the law. If in doubts, please consult the relevant regulatory body or professional advisor and ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
In the event of any dispute arising out of or in relation to our credit ratings and reports, the Company shall have absolute discretion in all matters relating to resolving the dispute, including but not limited to the interpretation of disclaimers and policies.
Copyright © 2023 by CSPI Credit Ratings Company Ltd. All rights reserved.